Investigate homicide investigation in France - Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss about the Investigatehomicideinvestigation in France. Answer: Introduction The O.J. Simpson homicide case known as the People of the State of California v/s Orenthal James Simpson was a famous felonious lawsuit held at the Los Angeles County Superior court. In this case, the previous National Football League (NFL) sports person, newscaster and performer Orenthal James O.J.Simpson was adjudicated for committing two murders on June 12, 1994. He was alleged for murdering his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and the waiter of the Mezzalua restaurant Goldman. The case lasted for 11 months starting from November 9, 1994. Simpson was declared as exemplary by the decree on October 3, 1995. It was the most promoted felonious lawsuit in the history. It is generally known as The Lawsuit of the Century. Afterwards, the Brown and Goldman families registered a lawsuit against Simpson. On February 4, 1997, he was found guilty of the two deaths and the families were recompensed an amount of $33.5 million.This review is about the important aspects of the lawsuit and the defects which were recognized in its examination. Furthermore, recommendations have also been given to overcome these defects in the future examinations. The impact of media on the result of this trial has also been discussed in the following paragraphs. The key aspects of the examination involved in the lawsuit In the "The Trial of the Century, the accused O.J.Simpson was represented by a high profile group of defense attorneys known as the Dream Team. It was led by Robert Shapiro and Johnnie Cochran. The additional attorneys were F. Lee Bailey,Alan Dershowitz,Robert Kardashian,Shawn Holley,Carl E. Douglas, andGerald Uelmen. Barry ScheckandPeter Neufeld were specialized in DNA evidence. The lawsuit lasted for eleven months from November 9, 1994, to October 3, 1995. The opening proclamations were made on January 24, 1995. The decree was awarded on October 3, 1995, when he was declared guilt free for both the murders. After he was being acquitted, there were no further detentions (CBS News, 2017). The homicide of Nicole Brown and Ronald Goldman was alleged to have after 10.00 pm on June 12, 1994. It was revealed by a neighbor after twelve in the night. The police were called for an examination of evidence and to decide if the case was worth examining and the records were unaffected. After investigation, it was revealed that his ex-wife Brown was attacked many times on her head and neck and had defending injuries on her hands. The casualties were dead for around two hours before the examination started. They also investigated Kato Kaelin who was Simpsons friend and an actor, staying at his guest house. Apart from other proofs, the examiners found a mitten on the examination spot and hair on it was similar to that of Goldmans. Simpson was not present at the time of the investigation. The investigators went to his estate to inform him about his wifes homicide. On the way back, they saw blood stains over his Ford. When the examiners arrived at the spot in the morning, he was not present. He had taken a flight to Chicago late night on the previous day. Upon investigation of the house, another blood stained glove was found, which was same as the earlier found glove. The blood on it was of the deceased casualties.This was the possible reason for the arrest warrant of Simpson. Besides this, the DNA of the blood on Simpsons socks in his bedroom was that of Browns. The hair which was found on Goldmans shirt was similar to that of Simpsons. Dark blue cotton fibers were present on Goldman were similar to that of Simpsons shirt (Harris, 2013). Evidence revealed that he was alleged in 1989 for attacking his wife, so taking into account his violent nature, there was a possibility of murdering his wife. The size of the shoe imprints present on the site also resembled that of Simpsons (Moore, 2014). The defects in the examination process of the crime, having an impact on its result In the O.J.Simpson case, logical proofs should have been given utmost importance. It was proved that DNA of the blood stains found at the site and on Simpsons car were of Goldman,Brown and Simpson.So, it gave the investigators a chance to declare him guilty. The police withdrew themselves from the case by handling it incompetently (Fahsing, 2016). There were certain examples where they mismanaged the evidence such as keeping the proofs of blood inside plastic rather than keeping in paper boxes, where they could deteriorate. The blood samples were collected after a long time when the crime was commited. The police had not submitted them to the laboratory immediately after they were collected from the site. These were some illustrations to show that the proofs had been mismanaged by the police (Ladapo, 2017). The defense attorneys believed that the blood samples gathering and its evaluation were mismanaged so that the altering could not be denied. As a result, the examination of the DNA could not be accepted. The police removed the stains from the fence , after two weeks of the crime. The investigation process for the OJ Simpson case was not systematic. It completely focused on him and no other suspects were examined (Kumar Goyal, 2017). An incident room which is used to examine the suspects was not used in this case for the reason that Simpson was the only suspect. The examination of Simpson was a failure because the police did not ask the required questions and any evidence which could have been necessary to the case was ignored. Because of lack of communication an important proof was lost. The prints of the bloodstained fingerprints were not collected. It may sound absurd that some members of the investigation team did not pay attention to the other members advice because they were less experienced (Fisher Fisher, 2012). Due to the interference of the media, the body of Nicole Brown was covered with a blanket which altered the evidence and it could not be used to prove anything against Simpson. The cameras were encapsulated in the courtroom. This resulted in the case being forged and dramatic. The glove which was doubted to be of Simpsons was introduced in the court to give him a trial. It was too small for his hand, which gave the attorneys an opportunity to prove his innocence. All the evidence enabled the attorneys to prove that he was not guilty of the murder of his wife and her friend (Crime Museum, 2017). Methods through which the nonsuccess of the examination could have been overcome and their prevention in the future examinations The investigation process of the O. J. Simpson case highlighted the errors committed by the police in its forensic work and it was set as a guideline before the law administration. There were certain flaws in the investigative procedures and it gave the opportunity to the attorneys to prove Simpsons innocence (Parrillo, 2017). Some of them are as follows and there are certain suggestions to improve them in the future examinations: Poor handling of the proofs by the Los Angeles police gives the lesson that proper processes should be followed regarding the proofs and honest revelations should be made before the jury. The evidence should not be contaminated and should be preserved properly. When Simpson was declared innocent of killing his wife and her friend, the Los Angeles Police Department made certain changes in its investigative section which was referred to as a cesspool of contamination for careless handling of proofs. Another defect, in this case, was that the basis of proofs was not defined and they couldnt be easily tracked. For example, the police observed the blood-stained pair of socks found in the Simpsons bedroom, two months later, only when they were examined at the crime laboratory. The forensic technicians were offended by poor packing of proofs. The proofs were left in an overheating van on a summer day. Due to this, the police now utilize barcodes to scan and track them and the investigation is more strictly controlled by properly trained investigators. Last but not the least, the proofs which are collected must be evaluated carefully before presenting to the court. They must be sorted as competent and incompetent which should not be presented before the jury. They should also be able to interlink between the proofs (Burney Pemberton, 2013). So, examination procedure in any crime is crucial and it should be handled prudently. The crime scenarios should be safeguarded and all the suspects must be examined. The proofs should be carefully handled by experienced criminalists so that the jury is able to make the right decision (Abdollah, 2014). Effect of media on the outcome of the case The impact of media on any newsworthy incident cannot be ignored. It covers certain events such as celebrity news, natural disasters, corruption and murder. The most well-known case in this context is the murder trial of OJ Simpson (1994-95). Simpsons case was affected by the intervention of media. It is described as one of the most famous cases in American history. While the journalists took the photographs of the deceased victims and the cameras were encapsulated in the courtroom to broadcast the case. It resulted in the contamination and devastation of evidence. The trial of OJ Simpson was connected to racial judgment against the blacks. Undeniably, the place of filing the suit was affected by the racial issues. It was against the renowned African American, gained a lot of public attention from the African American public. As a result, it received a lot of coverage from the media (Brunty, Miller Helenek, 2014). They keenly waited to observe if a black person can receive justice from the American jury. As a consequence, they declared Simpson innocent to favor the public judgment. The media altered the doctrine of the case which had an impact on the focus of the investigators. The incidents of domestic violence which were associated with this case lifted it from murder to domestic violence. It enabled the investigators to accept that Simpson was guilty much before appropriate proofs were gathered. Another interesting point is the Glove Catastrophe. It reflects how media can influence the public opinion of a trail. It made a headline quoting If the glove doesnt fit, you must acquit. Actually, the quote was If it doesnt fit, you must acquit. So it misleads the decision of the OJ Simpson case (Rowe, 2014). The assessment to install the cameras in the courtroom also affected the decision of the case. It made the case forged and dramatic. One crucial issue in this regard is the differential reporting of the white and African American media. Most of the African Americans believed O.J.Simpson was not guilty and he was under attack due to his position. While the white media covered that he was guilty (Times News, 2014). So, it would not be wrong to say that the role of media had a severe impact on the decision of the case. It has the power to create hype among the people in accordance with the manner in which the case is predicted. It can influence the society by changing their opinion regarding their inclination towards either of the parties (Werner, 2015). Conclusion So, to conclude, it can be said that the case of O.J. Simpson is truly The Trial of the Century. It acted as a guideline for further crime investigations. Apart from enjoying the celebrity status, it drew the attention of media and the criminalists due to the errors committed by the police and the investigation department. On 3 October 1995 The Trial of the Century was concluded with the exculpation of O.J. Simpson from the killing of his wife and her friend. The jury took only four hours to declare him innocent. All the important components of this case such as the murders, trial, exculpation and the Brono car chase fascinated and wondered the nation (Parker, 2017). This trial was followed by the filing of a civil suit by the Brown and Goldman families against Simpson. On 4 February 1997, the jury declared Simpson guilty for both deaths. The deceaseds families were reimbursed with the damages amounting to $ 33.5 million, but they received only a meager amount. References Abdollah, T.(2014). OJ Simpson case taught police what not to do at a crime scene. [ONLINE] Retrieved from https://www.policeone.com/investigations/articles/7267753-OJ-Simpson-case-taught-police-what-not-to-do-at-a-crime-scene/ on 6 January,2018. Brunty, J., Miller, L. Helenek, K.(2014).Social Media Investigation for Law Enforcement. Routledge. Burney, I., Pemberton, N. (2013). Making space for criminalistics: Hans Gross and fin-de-sicle CSI. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 44(1), 1625. CBS News (2017).The O.J. Simpson trial: Where are they now? [ONLINE] Retrieved from https://www.cbsnews.com/pictures/the-o-j-simpson-trial-where-are-they-now/ on 30 December, 2017. Crime Museum (2017). Forensics at the OJ Simpson Trial. [ONLINE] Retrieved from https://www.crimemuseum.org/crime-library/justice-system/forensic-investigation-of-the-oj-simpson-trial/ on 6 January,2018. Fahsing, I., A.(2016). The Making of an Expert Detective Thinking and Deciding in Criminal Investigations. Sweden: Ineko. Fisher, B., A.,J. Fisher, D., R(2012)Techniques of Crime Scene Investigation, Eighth Edition. CRC Press. Harris, C. (2013).Investigating homicide investigation in France. Policing Society.23(3). Kumar,A. Goyal, M., K. (2017).Reconstruction of Crime Scene, a Forensic Technique used in Substantiating Alleged Homicide into Accidental Death: A Case Study. Journal of Forensic Research.8(4). Ladapo, O., A. (2017). Effective Investigations, A Pivot To Efficient Criminal Justice Administration: Challenges In Nigeria. African Journal of Criminology and Justice Studies: AJCJS.5 Moore ,S. ,K. (2014).The Murder of Angie Raye Dodge. An Investigative Case Review .Judges for Justice. [ONLINE] Retrieved https://judgesforjustice.org/media/Steve-Moore-Report-on-Chris-Tapp-October-7-2014.pdf. on 6 January,2018. Parker,R.(2017). Is O.J. Innocent? The Missing Evidence': Series Concludes With Debunk of Simpson Son Theory. [ONLINE] Retrieved from https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/is-oj-innocent-missing-evidence-series-concludes-debunk-simpson-son-theory-964874 on 6 January 2018. Parrillo,N., R.(2017).Administrative Law from the Inside Out: Essays on Themes in the Work of Jerry L. Mashaw. Cambridge University Press. Rowe, S.(2014). OJ Simpson: was he innocent all along? The Telegraph. [ONLINE] Retrieved from https://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/books/10892053/OJ-Simpson-was-he-innocent-all-along.html on 6 January,2018. Times News(2014) O.J. Simpson case and trial had lasting impact on media and the courts. [ONLINE] Retrieved from https://www.thetimesnews.com/20140613/oj-simpson-case-and-trial-had-lasting-impact-on-media-and-the-courts/306139777 on 6 January,2018 Werner ,E. (2015).Media Effects on Attitudes Towards the Criminal Justice System. [ONLINE] Retrieved from https://dc.etsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1296context=honors on 6 January,2018.